This weekend, I watched the hit 2005 animated movie Bratz: Rock Angelz. This movie was one of the first Bratz films in CGI, and let me tell you- the plot is ALL OVER THE PLACE. The girls start a fashion magazine and use stolen passes to get into hot London punk clubs, but when they lose their passes they decide that the only way to get into the gig is to become a rock band? This movie can be considered capitalist propaganda- the Bratz shop in order to destress about their problems, and it's an implemental part of their lives. They don't have jobs either- Jade has an internship, but only for three hours until she is fired. Chloe meets a TRASH British prince and ignores her best friend Yasmin who finds celebrity judge Byron Powell's (I don't make this stuff up) dog, Ozzy. Jade and Sasha try to do a photo shoot for the magazine, but Sasha micromanages the whole thing and makes her friend feel bad! And this whole time, there's these two evil blond twins (Kaley Cuoco PLA...
I've also been wondering where the line is drawn between animation and live action. So many films are almost entirely animated, but a few actors on screen make it a "live action" film. Particularly with the new Lion King film--there's literally no live action elements in that film. It should be called the CGI Lion King rather than live action. Just because it's a different kind of animation doesn't mean it's not animated.
ReplyDeleteI agree with Madison that the line has become so blurred, now more than ever. Even looking at Marvel films, people consider it live action yet half the costumes and weapons are done in post production. But what separates Iron Man from the Polar Express? How does a film done in CGI with real actors differentiate from Robert Downey Jr in a green suit?
ReplyDelete