Is ATLA an anime?
So there is a ton of debate in the anime and ATLA communities about whether or not Airbender qualifies as an anime. Many people define anime as strictly "Japanese animation". But I see it more as a separate art form, with different styles, trends, and tenants apart from just nationality. I just wanna know what y'all think on the topic. I personally see ATLA as an anime because it's influenced by recurring themes, art styles, and storytelling. Why not try to start a debate?
I know we discussed this after class, but I'll continue here. If Japanese Animation (Anime) created a style and then western countries imitate that style shouldn't we then call it Anime Style rather than Anime?
ReplyDeleteI'm in a polling group on facebook and someone asked about this a short while ago! The overall winner with 186 votes was "Soft yes" and "nah" was in second at 74. So 61% of the 305 people who responded were a hesitant yes and 24%. (The other choices in order of popularity were "hell yah" with 21 votes, "Based in many ways on anime, but isn't itself anime" with 21 votes, and "my hands are tied here" with 3 votes. It's a very informal polling group.)
ReplyDeleteI would be in the "based in many ways on anime" group, since I think of anime as a style of art? There's so many people all over the world who emulate it now, or started off drawing anime and morphed it into their own style. The art school debate of "is anime a legitimate art style" comes up fairly frequently on the internet (Ringling just recently got called out on twitter for discouraging their students from drawing anime and/or taking classes about anime) which I also think is an interesting topic, since a lot of art/animation programs seem to consider it, for lack of a better word, "low art" and almost treat it like taboo? It's really weird.
Okay, so I did a little research on this. Some scholars want to say that Anime is Japanese Animation production, period. Others argue that it's a style and good old merriam-webster says it's a style of animation originating in japan. So what if the style is done or imitated elsewhere? I think what we have to ask ourselves is, 'what do we gain or lose by our definition?' What does it mean if we take a show written and made in the west (like ATLA) and call it Anime? Isn't that completely misleading? Doesn't that lack authenticity? Or does the show simply need to adhere to a loose and amorphous group of anime style signifiers and then it's anime? If we define Anime narrowly as specific kind of style then I would say Miyazaki isn't anime and I don't want to say that. I think we gain more from keeping Anime as 'animation from Japan,' but ask me again next week and I may have changed my mind.
ReplyDelete