RDR2, Realistic?
A brand new Rockstar video game that came out over a couple weeks ago has taken the electronic gaming world by storm. Red Dead Redemption 2 is a CGI and animated game that follows the outlaw Arthur Morgan in his doings throughout the wild west in 1899. I personally haven't played this game yet but from what I have seen, it is very detailed in the story and in-game characters. Everything from shooting a person's head off to walking behind a horse and getting kicked can happen. There is a way for each specific player in this game to change the look of the main character Arthur. What has always amazed me is that in Rockstar games if a character is changed in the open world then that character will remain changed in the cutaway scenes, where the player is not in control. This fact remains in Red Dead 2. So, in conclusion, I believe that the game is very realistic. About as realistic as a video game can get.



Tom, amazing graphs and great point! The world is exploding with great animation and the latest blockbusters from the major studios sucks up all the oxygen!
ReplyDeleteThese are great! To add to this, I remember reading this article a couple years ago (https://www.cartoonbrew.com/award-season-focus/proof-that-oscar-voters-are-clueless-about-animation-109456.html) about how the reason why the Oscar for animation is so heavily skewed towards Pixar/the highest grossing feature is because most of the academy members don't actually watch all the films that were nominated. There's links to the full interviews with the voters, too, and it seems like most of them make decisions based on what their kids liked the best. The majority of them say they didn't even watch the animated shorts that year (this is the year that Big Hero 6 and Feast won.)
ReplyDeleteOne of them also says "If I was just voting for animation, I’d have gone with Boxtrolls. But since you have to consider everything, I went with Big Hero 6" - which also brings up the question of what the criteria for picking best animated film is or should be, in terms of technical/artistic achievement or content/story? Not that these interviews give me any confidence there's any method to the madness, but y'know, maybe there should be??
Warning this is political and not related to animation:
Deletethat makes me think how clear criteria for decision making can be so important:
https://slate.com/culture/2018/09/john-oliver-florida-voting-last-week-tonight.html
I'll be honest in saying that anything I know about animation has previously been through Disney and Pixar. I love How to Train Your Dragon and I put that under my favorite animated film on the list in class, but I wonder if I had more exposure to this world of animation if it would even be on my radar. My lack of experience with the world of animation is seriously concerning, but we are shaped by the culture we live in and that says that Disney and Pixar are the ones to watch and the ones that deserve all the awards. I'm hoping the class might help me with this. Btw these are fantastic charts, Thomas.
ReplyDeleteBig and small I love them all! Well, not all, but you know what I'm saying
DeleteI've always thought that animation wasn't given enough time or consideration in award ceremonies. I'd never thought that perhaps the people judging the films wouldn't even have criteria for judging them. That's just...ridiculous
ReplyDeleteagreed!
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteAardman deserved better.
ReplyDelete